Before addressing the NEW Reformation, let us examine the original (Protestant) or old reformation in order to put the subject in context. The original reformation began with a priest by the name of Martin Luther. In these days of old the Catholic Church was the only recognized legitimate authority. As a matter of historic record there were several measures in place to ensure that this situation remained in effect. First all Bibles were written in Latin and only those of the priestly class were allowed to even read them. By keeping the Bible out of the hands of commoners and in a scholarly language, they were assured that the masses could not question their authority. With this in place, then the Pope was considered supreme and whatever rule he imposed was considered God’s word and final authority. Those who disagreed with the church were branded heretics and whoever killed a heretic got a get into heaven free pass. This was the ultimate reward because the whole salvation system was built on works, specifically obedience to the churches rule of law. All of these rules were designed to empower the church and bring advantage and benefit to the power elite of the status quo. Being too intricate and numerous to mention they nevertheless all served this primary function. 
Then along came this priest named Martin Luther who happened to read in the Bible where “the just shall live by faith.” This of course ran counter to established doctrine and violated the powerbase of church leadership, so it was not well received by the authorities. However being persuaded to obey God and not man, Martin Luther set himself on a course of action which shook the primitive church’s foundation, the effects of which we are still feeling today. That is how he came to be known as the Reformer.
Much could be said in this regard, but it might fill volumes and such is not our purpose, so let us summarize. Martin Luther began to publish and preach his 95 Thesis, which were 95 points of observation into God’s plan of salvation as opposed to traditional church teaching. Since Luther was a priest he couldn’t just simply be killed. First he had to be excommunicated, then branded a heretic and then killed otherwise it would have reflected poorly on the church. This gave Luther many opportunities not available to laity as well as respect from the grass roots movement that came to be known as the reformation. Those seekers of Truth to hear this man of God’s words were given a time of refreshing before the whip came down and even afterwards were inspired to question their traditional ignorance.
So here was the problem with the reformation, having a new foundation of Truth to stand on nevertheless the old form was maintained to contain it. This form although not identical to the original was formulated from the old, thereby invalidating the relevance of the New Truth. So then as it turns out, everyone has their piece of the puzzle which they mistake for the Big Picture. So instead of putting the pieces together to get the big picture, they fight and argue over who has the right piece. If my green piece is what makes me right then your blue piece must be wrong, right? Surely grass and sky cannot both be part of the same picture, so it must be grass.
We cannot fault those of old for using whatever form was available at the time, but now a day’s the form of formlessness and thoughts of the unthinkable should be commonplace, except we still cling to our old forms. So thus has NEW Reformation come to correct this discrepancy. When Martin Luther published his 95 Thesis he was confronting the prevailing error of his day. We have done the same thing with our 95 Thesis of NEW Reformation because mortal church must recognize its futility before it ceases to exist, if that means we must laugh at them, then so be it.
NEW Reformation stands on the Truth of God Union as the Gospel and considers any other interpretation to be in error regardless of how useful it may be. Perhaps then the useful forms of error could be Good and the useless forms are bad but neither is perfect because for that, Union with God is necessary. So it seems we have Perfect Truth (or Only Truth) which is God Union, then we have good truth which is useful relationship with God and we have bad truth which is useless relationship with God. Obviously if you must serve an untruth, then good truth is best but we are committed to Truth, not to serving an untruth, which is probably why you have never heard this before.
So what is the Truth of NEW Reformation? We do not believe you have the technical capabilities to understand that answer even if we answer it because it involves the quantum field you call me. So let us once again find a less than adequate reference by which to explain it. Identity in Christ is the only reference that is adequate because it refers to the quantum dynamics of Salvation, yet to explain it another way we must dip into inadequacy. Since we are growing exceedingly weary of allowing for exceptions to Truth by making provision for inadequacy so that others may remain mortal, maybe we won’t even go there and instead say something like this.
NEW Reformation is about the Covenant of Immortality that the New Testament witnesses to. It is your Identity in Christ, the quantum mechanical study of the Name Christ Jesus, the quantum physiology of the Body of Christ, a transformational Identity Matrix, God’s Word, Gospel Truth, the morphogenetic resonance in the resurrected flesh of our Living Savior, divine genetics in our collective consciousness, the perceptual ratio of personal identity, revelation of mortal church ignorance and the comical appreciation of their arrogance. Responsible Energy Management, pretty much says it all and is the dogma of our theology. Have A GOD Day boils it all down rather nicely. NEW Reformation is about the God that God made YOU to be. We did not make you God, God did, what do you think Jesus showed up for, just to point the way; no to make YOU the way. All this of course points to Quantum Covenant as the Fulfillment of Scripture.
So did you think we were just going to throw another rulebook on you and play mortal church like all the rest??? If so we are quite pleased to disappoint you because that would not be Reformation, only more bondage. We are trying to set the captives free, not throw a chain to a drowning man. You get enough of that from mortal church, we want to correct the malfunction not compound it. As tempting as it is to go on and throw down on mortal church, it might just be time to end this and call it GOOD!!!
HAMMER DOWN all the way to GOD, all aboard for NEW Reformation.
